In NZ, among the purveyors of such fraudulent tactics – and
even taxpayer funded to boot – is Rainbow Youth. In May 2014 came news that the
group was piloting in Whangarei “a new support group for young people
questioning their sexual identity,” to be known as the “I’m Local” project… “It
wants to work with schools, community centres, hospitals, doctors, libraries
and marae.”(1) Etc.
Established as Auckland Lesbian and Gay Youth (ALGY) at
Easter 1989, in 1995 the group became an incorporated society and was renamed
Rainbow Youth. As at 3rd December 1989, on an Access Radio
homosexual programme, ALGY was described thus: One of the vital things of ALGY
is self esteem and the building up of self confidence of the young people who
come along. One of its main functions is to provide a safe and supportive environment
for young people “to have fun and discuss politics, or
whatever.”(emphasis added)
On 12th July 1991 the NZ Herald reported a
furore after ALGY had been given a
$26,000.00 grant by the Lotteries Board to have two homosexuals go into Auckland secondary
schools. On 15th July the Herald and the Auckland Star
joined the criticism in their editorials. In the Sunday Star of 28th
July 1991 ALGY member Shaun Hawthorne was revealed as one of those two
homosexuals.
He was also an “agony aunt” on the homosexual radio
programme “In The Pink” on 95bFM as from 7th July 1991. In the above
28th July item Hawthorne
was quoted thus : “Becoming a homosexual is not a decision anyone takes
lightly.” On 25th August 1991 on 95bFM he encouraged promiscuity by
declaring “There is nothing wrong with
short-term relationships.” Etc.
In 1993 ALGY organized an August 22nd Forum to
plan a fresh move into high schools…”to run assertiveness workshops on suicide
prevention, coming out at high school, dealing with your parents, Christian and
gay youth” etc. ALGY lesbian activist Pip Brown discussed the coming Forum on
Radio GALA 3rd August 1993 on Auckland Access Radio. Action
suggestions were to include : “Perhaps attend the August 22nd Forum,
even under pretext of being parent of a homosexual.” (Emphasis added)
On 11th February 1999, as Rainbow Youth, the
group was part of a political protest outside the Baptist Tabernacle in Queen Street Auckland
How political
strategies of the homosexual movement change over time
Examples of NZ lobbying with a clear ring of recruitment can
be found as far back as the 1970’s, such as :-
- In
1979 the (then) NZ National Gay Rights Coalition (NGRC) were responsible
for the insinuating into some Christchurch secondary schools a leaflet
entitled “On Being Homosexual”. It included eight “advantages” of being
homosexual.(2) A founder member of NGRC was a
- On
Radio Pacific 20th May 1979 on the Jon Osman talkback programme
three lesbians were featured, proclaiming “You can choose to be
gay!” One of them was a
- By 1982 the Family Planning Association (FPA) was encouraging homosexual activity with its sex education kit for children as young as thirteen years. In Unit 5 on Contraception, page 7, it declared matter-of-factly : “Of course, if you have sexual relations with someone of the same sex there is no need for contraception.”
With examples of
moral corruption such as this masquerading as legitimate education, we should hardly wonder, then, at NZ’s high
youth suicide rate. Yet the likes of Rainbow Youth even have the audacity to get into schools,
presuming to be running “assertiveness workshops in suicide prevention”, as
already mentioned.
In the 1970’s, of course, the homosexual political lobby was
quite openly socialist in its blaming of “capitalism” for all its woes, with
emphasis on the pursuit of “liberation, struggle” etc. A quote:-
We have written articles and position papers that trumpet
loudly for the abolition of sexism in all its forms; denounced capitalism as
the prime force in gay oppression, and referred to the need for the establishment of a socialist
society….” (3)
Since then, however, there has occurred a sea change in
political strategy, with subsequent inherent deceit. From raucous demands for
“liberation from capitalist oppression”, the strategy now is to emphasise
suffering victimhood, which demands sympathy and, from opponents, a sense of
guilt.
This revolutionary change has come about since the 1980’s.
It was then, in 1987, that two American homosexual marketers, Marshall Kirk and
Erastes Pill, released their crafty blueprint for revolutionary change entitled
The Overhauling of Straight America. Number two of a “media campaign to
change the image of gays in America ”
was to “Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers.” A quote:-
“In
any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of
protection so that straights will be inclined
by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented,
instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and
deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that
justifies resistance and oppression . For that reason we must resist the
temptation to strut our ‘gay pride’ publicly when it conflicts with the Gay
Victim image.
“There
are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First,
the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the
sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference.
[sic] The message must read : ‘As far as gays can tell they were born gay, just
as you were born heterosexual, white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody
ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally
blameworthy. What they do isn’t willfully contrary – it’s only natural for
them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!’
“The
second message would portray gays as victims of society. The
straight majority does not recognise the suffering it brings to the lives of
gays and must be shown graphic pictures of brutalised gays; dramatisations of
job and housing insecurity, loss of child custody, and public humiliation; and
the dismal list goes on.” Etc. (4) – (emphasis added)
Pursuit of “support groups”
and “safe” environments based on false pretences
It will
hardly be just coincidence that Rainbow Youth, as ALGY, began its life in 1989,
just after the 1987 publication of that blockbuster Kirk and Pills plot for the
shift in strategy from being anti-capitalist to one of “gay victimhood”. Fast forward now to 9th
September 2008 when, on Rainbow Youth’s website, it discussed ways of creating
“queer straight alliance groups in schools”, and rationalised this ideological
exploiting of the concept of “safety”, thus :-
“All students need a safe learning environment to
thrive. The United Charter of Rights for Children states : ‘Every child has the right to an
education and the right to be safe.’ Section 60 of the Education Act 1989
directs that schools ensure that their pupils are safe emotionally and
physically. Schools are also required to
analyse in what ways pupils are not safe, and in what ways (they) are
inhibited from learning. (United Nations, 1989 as cited in Sullivan 2000). For
more information about this contact Judie Alison from the NZ PPTA to obtain a
booklet called ‘Affirming Diversity of Sexualities in the School Community’.”
Yet that booklet, published in 2001, and the work of
homosexual teachers at the PPTA, and therefore with a heavy pro-homosexual
bias, surely could only lead enquiring youth to further confusion. After all,
it had been the work of the PPTA’s Advisory Committee on homosexual issues –
the Safe Schools Task Force. Established in 2001 it comprised : convenor, Robin
Duff ( to become President by 2007, and a homosexual activist since the
1970’s), lesbian secretary Judie Alison, (then) President, and Jo Belgrave,
Hamilton G.H.S. teacher.
So for that reason alone, the overall credibility of that
booklet should have been in question. One aspect of it was of particular
concern to me : the specious and
fraudulent assertion that “Some people still confuse [that is, link] homosexuality with
pedophilia”, as if the two are not intrinsically linked. After all, my
dictionary lists “pederasty/paederasty (as) homosexual relations between men
and boys.” (5)
So, as secretary of the (now defunct) Credo Society Inc.,
on 30th March 2001 I wrote to
secretary Alison to protest about this
outright falsehood, and – considering the pamphlet’s educational source – its
numerous spelling errors also. No reply
was ever received, either to that letter or to two further attempts I subsequently made.
So much, then, for Rainbow Youth’s rationale for having
“queer straight alliance groups” in NZ schools, thousands of which now flourish
in the USA : namely, that “all students need a safe learning environment to
thrive”. Of course, it all depends on what is meant by “safe learning
environment”, clearly not what the average person deems it to mean, as we shall
also see in the following.
The American
situation : the same only more advanced
Linda Harvey of Mission America, on “safety” as in
homosexual political activism : “Traditional minded kids and Christian kids
are now being insulted for believing that homosexuality is unnatural and
deviant. So then we install a new definition of ‘safety’, and this is the reality of anti-bullying bills passed
in Maine, in Iowa, in California, and proposed in a bill to Congress right now
[as at 2009] that ‘safety’ is freedom from hearing any criticism of, or
warnings about, homosexuality…..That, my friends, is one of the new idea
‘anti-bullying’ tactics towards creating ‘safe’ schools. (emphasis added)
“The education profession [in USA] is managing to get away
with this manipulation…More and more programmes are linking all disapproval of
homosexuality, or even cross dressing and sex change, with violence or potential violence.”etc.(6)
Sonja Dalton of Mission America Drug-Free
Schools
“Day of Silence” (DOS) One of many Jennings
political initiatives, it has been in USA schools since 2001. Commentator
J. Matt Barber wrote : “On April 25th
[2008] GLSEN held their annual ‘Day of Silence’ propaganda push [when] teachers
and students in roughly three thousand middle schools, high schools and
colleges across the country are cynically used as culture war pawns in an
effort to legitimise conventionally immoral, objectively deviant, and
demonstrably high risk sexual behaviours.
“Kids and teachers are [thus] encouraged to disrupt the
school day by refusing to speak in class as a show of support to students who
self identify as ‘GLBT’. The reality is
that DOS has very little to do with ‘bullying’ and has everything to do
with pro-homosexual, anti-Christian indoctrination.. During DOS many kids who
hold time-honoured traditional values relative to sexual morality are
frequently and ironically tagged as ‘hateful’, ‘bigoted’ and ‘homophobic’ Who’s
doing the bullying?” (8)
Class credit for keeping quiet. “A high school in New Hampshire recently
[2010] awarded credits towards graduation for students who participated in a
national school-based observance for homosexual rights. Officials at Bedford High School
Transgenderism. Another bizarre homosexual political
issue in the USA ,
but now also emerging in NZ – see below. Earlier I quoted the “anti-bullying”
bill passed in Maine
in 2009, which was only achieved through devious and deceitful manipulation of
the language; namely through the bogus definition of what constituted safety.
Now, several years later, the US
state of Maine
has become one of many litigating battlegrounds around this further issue.
A biological male who, we are told, “identified” as a female
at age two (sic) who is now 16 year old Nicole Maines, had been using the
girls’ toilet at school, until the parent of a boy complained, upon which “she”
was told to use an adult toilet. Nicole’s parents then complained of
“discrimination”, thus initiating a major legal wrangle, but ably assisted by a
Boston-based Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders’ Rights Project. Now Maine
Supreme Court has ruled in Nicole’s favour. Schools across USA are now
grappling with farcical issues such as this. (10)
Transgender
activism in NZ
While the pernicious issue of transgenderism is now becoming
entrenched in the USA
it is hardly surprising that we in NZ hear little or nothing of it in our
largely leftist news media. Indeed it is really only thanks to the NZ lobby
Family First that we are alerted to this latest insidious influence which,
clearly, will all be part of the “gay” agenda. (11)
They reported that Rainbow Youth had been in collaboration
with the University of Auckland’s Adolescent Health Research Group, in research entitled “The Health and Well-Being of Transgender
High School Students”.(12) Predictably, one of its “recommendations” is that
“changing rooms should be ‘safe’ (sic) environments”. Equally deceptive is
Rainbow Youth’s interpretation of events : “The research shows just how tough
life is for trans youth!”(13)
Clearly, many young people, as well as families and wider
communities, and even nations, are being
grievously manipulated and misled, as schools are covertly used by such social
change agents posing as saviours and mentors, under the pretext of offering
“safe environments”. Interestingly, Rainbow Youth’s general manager Duncan
Matthews, when newly appointed in 2013, bragged “I am good at managing people.”(14)
Disturbingly, alongside the youth-directed chatty patter of
that item lurked information of a vastly different kind, and far nearer to the
real nitty gritty of the homosexual lifestyle : advertisements for male
homosexual bath houses. Discreetly in microscopic-sized type were lists of
certain lewd and decadent “services” available, such as “dungeons”,
“sucktoriums” and the like.
Funding for what,
and by whom?
Government and various other funding sources need to be
called to account over their financial support for such pernicious and
deceitful activism. An example on 4th June 2010 was when National’s
Auckland Central MP Nikki Kaye announced
in a press release her “pleasure” that Rainbow Youth was to receive $5,000.00
of Government funding “to deliver education workshops in Auckland schools…The
work that (they) undertake in schools aims to create a safer [sic] environment
for young people. The workshops help people gain a greater understanding of
sexual orientation and gender identity.. The Services for Young People Fund is
designed to help young people reach their potential [sic], stay on track for
success, and have a say in their local communities.” Sheer balderdash, of
course!
Also, the Rainbow Youth website
on 9th September 2008 read : “Proudly sponsored” by such as (then)
Auckland City Council and the NZ Lottery Grants Board. Under
“Gay/Transgender/Straight (queer) Groups in Schools” there was also
considerable detail on this. It included workshops on “Heterosexism and
Homophobia” and “How to be a drag king/queen” etc.!
As well, in discussion ideas :
“In what ways can your group get involved in politics with regard to lobbying
for legislative changes?” etc. This, surely, proof of what the activism is really
all about : the radicalising of youth for the ideological cause. Further
suggestions included “Guests could speak on ‘reconciling spirituality and
sexuality…Influential speakers could include drag queens” etc.!
Also on funding : Nowhere,
surely, is the burgeoning bureaucracy of the “gay rights” movement better
illustrated than by quoting from the abovementioned University of Auckland
transgender “research” in collaboration with Rainbow Youth, where funding
sources are listed as “Ministries of Youth Development, Social Development,
Health, Education and Justice, and the Department of Labour, the Families
Commission and the Alcohol Advisory Council.
Covert,
ideologically driven agenda
Clearly, the evidence
is undeniable that a covert, ideologically driven, United Nations-linked agenda
is operating here to subvert Western Judeo Christian cultural values, and that
the homosexual issue is an integral part of this. Many people do see
this of course, both in NZ and overseas.
Here in NZ author and publisher Ian Wishart has written the
explosive Eve’s Bite, whose cover reads : “Seductive, deceptive and
dangerous : the Trojan Horse ideologies poisoning our country and destroying
the West.” According to Wikipedia : “In [this] book Wishart argues that NZ
society is being ‘poisoned’, and the Western world as a whole undermined ‘by
seductive and destructive philosophies and social engineering that within the
space of a generation have intellectually crippled the greatest civilisation
the world has ever seen.’” Moreover its back cover bears favourable comments
from such as the Northern Advocate, NZ Herald, NZ Listener and Evening Standard. Yet the grim
irony is that Wishart’s book, and this crucial public issue, remain largely
unacknowledged, let alone discussed, by
New Zealand’s mainstream media, seemingly to be avoided at all cost. (15)
Overseas, American lesbian, and former highly influential
member of the women’s and homosexual
political movements, Tammy Bruce, in
2003 wrote The Death of Right and Wrong, a powerful and damning
examination of what she variously terms
the “Left Elite”, or “Cultural Elite”, or “Feminist and Gay Elites”.(In
NZ for speaking engagements in July 2005, barely a whiff of this, of course,
was to reach the public). Referring to a particularly outrageous miscarriage of
justice, she wrote :-
“How does the Left Elite indoctrinate decent,
thoughtful people into accepting, as an example, that some killers are victims
and deserve to be set free? Keep in mind, I speak of the Elite not necessarily
as a cabal, but as a group of people who share basic assumptions, a world view.
One now-accomplished goal is the brainwashing of society into believing that
because of the colour of their skin, or their gender, or their sexual
preference, some in our ‘multi-cultural society’ can never be understood by
others, making judgement and punishment inappropriate.
“The corollaries are that traditional concepts of
responsibility are outdated, and that expecting others to behave with dignity,
and expecting society to recognise the concepts of right and wrong, is contrary
to the ideal of liberty. Every idea, every act, has the same value – none is more
worthy than another. And judgement? That, of all intellectual actions, is
heresy in this bacchanalian world.”
Also : “While the religious are marginalised as ‘right-wing
fanatics’, ‘extremists’, or ‘intolerant neoconservatives’, the conditioning of the
general public into moral relativism continues. We are told that gay men need
to be ‘understood’, yet the gay community is full of men who are sexual
compulsives, having hundreds of sex partners a year while spreading an incurable
disease or two.” Etc.(16)
Also overseas : Russia
Take Christian organisation United Families International,
on the remarkable and astonishing moral
renewal occurring in Russia; where, in 2013, a law was passed banning the
promotion of homosexual propaganda to young people under 18 years, or the
holding of homosexual rallies.-
What has occurred in Russia Russia
Similarly from Christian commentator Pat Buchanan, who
recalled a speech Vladimir Putin had made in December 2013 “where the former
KGB chief spoke of Russia
standing against a decadent West.” He quotes Putin:-
“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from
their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place
on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in
God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”
Buchanan continued : “With Marxism-Leninism a dead faith,
Putin is saying the new ideological struggle is between a debauched West led by
the USA and the
traditionalist world Russia
would be proud to lead.(18)
“When Putin refers to ‘Euro-Atlantic countries’ moving away
from their roots he will almost certainly have in mind those yielding to
pressure to conform to international obligations in the area of human rights
and minority rights in particular. In a 2013 report from Moscow
about the criticism of Russia ’s
ban on homosexual propaganda, ‘Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov defended the bill
in February, saying Russia
doesn’t have any international or European commitment to allow [sic] the
propaganda of homosexuality’.”(19)
The implication of that appears to be that countries which
have so conformed have done so only because of some UN obligation to do so.
This certainly appears to have been the case with various European Union member
countries in recent times, with their major moral shifts in homosexual-related
legislation.
Similarly with the seemingly charmed life of the homosexual
lobby in countries such as the USA , from the Obama Administration down, Canada , Australia , etc. Here in NZ also, of
course, with sweeping pro-homosexual and other legislative changes, and the
likes of Rainbow Youth being taxpayer funded to infiltrate the education system
with its subversive propaganda, and to be even lauded by elected MP’s such as
Nikki Kaye for doing so.
“Report from Moscow
Two quotes from American Christian campaigner Pastor Scott
Lively, in his 2013 Report From Moscow, where he was helping to plan the
World Congress of Families VIII, due to occur there in September 2014:-
·
“Americans tend to
still equate Russia with
communism, without realising that Russia US Russia
·
“How incredibly
ironic it is that Russia US Russia
is re-emerging as a Christian nation, while the US
Conclusion
Given the evidence, surely only a fool, or one in collusion,
would deny that we in the West are facing a heinous revolution in culture; that
even in the area of homosexual political activism alone, the NZ education
system encourages morally corrupting influences, general permissiveness, and
bogus “safe environments”. This in turn must sew seeds of confusion and even
mental disorder, with risk of youth suicide. Ironically, then, we have the
farce and contradiction of publicly funded Rainbow Youth in schools under the
treacherous and devious guise of suicide prevention! This is simply
unscrupulous exploiting of youth for the ideological cause.
However, ironically this is NZ and not Russia, so the
spreading of toxic homosexual propaganda persists, with such as the NZ
Herald sly rant “Change starts in the classroom” by a nonentity named Josh
Wright, “part of a team of young people starting a campaign called ‘Let’s talk
about sex’”! (21) Most certainly the general news media has much to answer for;
to say nothing of our political and educational leaders and people of influence
in general.
________________________________________________________________________
References
1.
“’WhangaReinbow’
offers support”. Whangarei Leader 27th May 2014.
2.
Reported in
Concerned Parents’ Association Newsletter, April/May 1979.
3.
Excerpt from “Some
questions on Gay Liberation” in aequus, Gay Liberation Front, Christchurch
4.
In Guide
Magazine, November 1987.
5.
“Pederasty [or]
paederasty : homosexual relations between men and boys” in Collins Dictionary
and Thesaurus 1991.
6.
Linda Harvey of
Mission America , in a speech
to Americans For Truth in Chicago
7.
Sonja Dalton :
“Who is Kevin Jennings, and why you should care”. www.missionamerica.com 6th
July 2009, and quoting Linda Harvey from World Net Daily – no date supplied.
8.
J. Matt Barber :
“Kids say ‘Enough with the gay stuff!’” – Concerned Women For America
9.
Class credit for
keeping quiet” : Kevin Smith, executive director Cornerstone Action in New Hampshire
10.
“Bathroom ban
violated transgender student’s rights”. http://nbcnews.com
31st Jan. 2014.
11.
“Push for gender
confusion in schools” : Family First Lobby media release 31st July 2014.
12.
“The Health and
Well-Being of Transgender High School Students : Results from the NZ Adolescent
Health Survey (Youth ’12)”; T.C.Clark et al, Journal of Adolescent Health
55 (2014) pp93-99.
13.
“Schools offered
trans-inclusive ideas” – www.gayNZ.com 30th July 2014.
14.
“Meet Rainbow
Youth’s new General Manager” – www.gayNZ.com
7th Sept. 2013.
16.
The Death of
Right and Wrong : Tammy Bruce. Three
Rivers Press New York 2003
17.
Carol Soelberg,
President United Families International , UFI Alert, 7th June 2013.
18.
Pat Buchanan “Whose side is God on now?” Townhall.com 4th
April 2014.
19.
“Russian lawmakers
pass anti-gay bill banning ‘propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations’ in
436-0 vote” – Jason Howerton, 11th June 2013, Moscow. (The Blaze/AP)
20.
Scott Lively
Ministries’ Report From Moscow, posted 18th October 2013. www.scottlively.net/2013/10/18report-from-moscow/
21.
NZ Herald 3rd September 2014, pageA27.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Barbara
Faithfull B.A.(Psych.Anthr.)
11th
September 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment